Pinterest and Reddit for Affiliate Sites: Which Traffic Sources Are Worth It Before Google Arrives
A new affiliate site has three to six months before Google sends anything, and every guide to filling that gap lists the same ten platforms as if they were equal. They aren't. For a product site, two or three are worth an hour a week, a few are worth nothing, and one is a trap that eats the time the guides needed.
This post ranks the non-search sources for a product site in its first six months, with what each costs in hours per visit, what kind of site it suits, where Amazon's rules let the link go, and what to skip.
The social media post covers the platforms Amazon accepts for direct links (YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook pages, X, Twitch); this is about the rest, and about sending traffic to the site rather than to Amazon.
The short answer
Pinterest if the category is visual, an email box from day one, and one or two topic communities as a real participant. YouTube only if you'll actually make videos. Everything else, including paid traffic, costs more than it brings at Amazon's rates.
On Pinterest, Reddit and forums the link goes to your guide, never a tagged Amazon link, because none of them is an accepted Amazon property. Cap the whole effort at a couple of hours a week; the guides are still the main job.
The sources, ranked
| Source | Works for | Cost per visit | Where the link goes | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Visual categories: home, kitchen, garden, crafts, kids, outdoor | Low once pins exist; they keep working for months | Your guide; no tagged links | Worth it for the right category | |
| Email list | Every site | Near zero; grows itself | Your guide (tagged links allowed to opted-in subscribers, but the guide converts better) | Start day one, expect little for months |
| Reddit and forums | Topics with active communities | High: hours of participation per visit | Your guide, only when asked; never Amazon | Worth it as a participant; worthless as a promoter |
| YouTube | Categories people watch before buying | High up front, then low; videos rank for years | Description to Amazon (accepted property) or to the guide | Worth it if you'll make videos |
| Facebook groups | Hobby topics with big groups | Medium; depends on group rules | Your guide, when allowed; a registered page for Amazon links | Occasionally |
| Quora and Q&A sites | Question-shaped topics | Medium; answers decay | Your guide | Marginal |
| Paid ads | Almost nothing at Amazon's rates | More than the commission | Your guide | Skip, except a small test on a high-rate direct program |
| Link exchanges, traffic bots, "social signals" services | Nothing | Your account | Nowhere | Skip; the backlinks post covers why |
Pinterest is a search engine for pictures of things people want to buy, which makes it the one social platform where a buyer guide fits natively. A pin is an image, a title and a link; a guide with a decent hero image and a clear title ("Best bike lights for commuting") becomes three or four pins in ten minutes, and good pins keep delivering clicks for months rather than hours.
The rules: the link goes to the guide on your site, not to Amazon. Pinterest isn't on Amazon's accepted list, so a tagged link in a pin is a link on an unregistered property.
Pinterest itself requires disclosure on affiliate content; a guide link isn't an affiliate link, but "affiliate site" in the pin description is cheap honesty. Categories that work: anything people decorate, cook, grow, make or give. Categories that don't: anything nobody photographs.
Not a traffic source in month one and the only one that compounds. A one-field box under the verdict from day one costs nothing; by the time search arrives there's a list to send the new guides to. The email list post covers what to send; the point here is that the box goes up in week one even though it collects nobody for a while.
Reddit and forums
The expensive one. Reddit traffic to an affiliate site comes from being known in a topic's subreddit as someone who answers questions well, and then, rarely, when a question is exactly what a guide answers, linking it with a plain "I wrote this up here".
Measured in hours per visit it's the worst source on the list. Measured in what else it gives (the questions people actually ask, which become guides; the products people actually complain about, which become caveats; the occasional link from someone who found the guide useful) it can earn its hour a week.
What doesn't work: posting links, posting links from a new account, posting links in a subreddit that bans them, or any Amazon link at all. Reddit isn't an accepted Amazon property and most subreddits treat affiliate links as spam.
YouTube
YouTube is an accepted Amazon property, videos rank in both YouTube and Google search for years, and product categories where people watch before buying (tools, tech, kitchen, fitness) send real traffic.
The cost is making videos, which most site owners say they'll do and don't. If you will, a video per top guide with the guide linked in the description is one of the few sources that beats Pinterest. If you won't, skip the channel and don't feel bad.
What to skip
- Paid traffic. The arithmetic in the FAQ: Amazon's rates don't cover a click.
- Posting the same link everywhere. LinkedIn, Discord, Telegram, Tumblr. Not accepted properties, not buying audiences, not worth the minute.
- Traffic services. Bots that visit your site. They inflate analytics, train nothing, and can look like click fraud on your Amazon links.
- More than two hours a week on any of this. The guides are what Google will eventually send traffic to; every hour here is an hour not there.
Doing it with AffSERP
Every guide written by AffSERP's X Best Review tool arrives with a hero image sized for sharing and a title built for the query, which is the raw material for a pin, a video description or a forum answer; the guide is the destination, and it's built to convert the visit. The sources above are about getting a reader to that page; the guide takes it from there.
FAQ
Does Pinterest work for affiliate sites?
For visual product categories (home, kitchen, garden, crafts, kids, outdoor gear), yes: pins to buyer guides keep bringing visits for months, and the audience is in a buying frame of mind. For categories nobody pins (networking gear, car parts, software) it's a waste. The link on the pin goes to your guide, not to Amazon: Pinterest isn't on Amazon's list of accepted social properties, so a tagged link there is a link on an unregistered site.
Can I post Amazon affiliate links on Reddit?
No. Reddit isn't an accepted property under Amazon's rules, most subreddits ban affiliate links outright, and the audience punishes anything that smells of promotion. What works on Reddit is being a real participant in the topic's subreddits and, rarely, linking to a guide on your site when someone asks the exact question it answers. Measured in hours per visit it's the most expensive source on the list; measured in links and ideas for guides it can be worth the time.
What's the best traffic source for a new affiliate site?
Search, which takes three to six months to arrive. Until then the sources worth an hour a week are Pinterest for visual categories, an email list from day one even if it's tiny, and topic forums or subreddits as a participant. YouTube is a real source if you'll make videos and a fantasy if you won't. Paid ads to an affiliate site almost never pay back at Amazon's commission rates.
Should I buy traffic for my affiliate site?
Almost never. At a 4% commission on a $50 product you earn $2 a sale; at a 5% conversion rate that's $0.10 a visit, and no ad network sells product-intent clicks for that. The exception is a small test on a high-commission direct program, and even then it's a test. The money is better spent on one more guide.
Keep reading
